Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study population
Characteristic
Control
N = 521
Streptomycin
N = 551
p-value2
gender
0.8
F
28 (54%)
31 (56%)
M
24 (46%)
24 (44%)
baseline_condition
0.7
1_Good
8 (15%)
8 (15%)
2_Fair
20 (38%)
17 (31%)
3_Poor
24 (46%)
30 (55%)
baseline_temp
0.8
1_<=98.9F/37.2C
4 (7.7%)
3 (5.5%)
2_99-99.9F/37.3-37.7C
12 (23%)
12 (22%)
2_99-99.9F/37.3-37.7C/37.3-37.7C
0 (0%)
1 (1.8%)
3_100-100.9F/37.8-38.2C
17 (33%)
14 (25%)
3_100-100.9F/37.8-38.2C/37.8-38.2C
0 (0%)
1 (1.8%)
4_>=101F/38.3C
19 (37%)
24 (44%)
baseline_esr
0.6
2_11-20
2 (3.9%)
3 (5.5%)
3_21-50
20 (39%)
16 (29%)
4_51+
29 (57%)
36 (65%)
Unknown
1
0
baseline_cavitation
30 (58%)
32 (58%)
>0.9
1 n (%)
2 Pearson’s Chi-squared test; Fisher’s exact test
There were no significant differences between the arms at the start of the trial.
Was the treatment successful?
model1 <-glm("improved ~ arm", data = strep)model1_res <- model1 |>tidy()
The result of the simplest logistic regression model (improved ~ arm) showed that those who got streptomycin had improved more often (p-value 1.2^{-4}).
Did anyone got resistance to the antibiotic?
ggplot(strep) +aes(strep_resistance) +geom_bar(aes(fill = gender), position =position_dodge()) +facet_wrap(vars(arm)) +theme_minimal() +coord_flip() +labs(title ="Majority were resistant to streptomycin after 6 months of treatment" ) +ylab("number of persons") +theme(axis.title.y =element_blank() )